<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Northern Light Strategic Research Portals - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-049c8866" type="application/json"/><link>http://northernlightsp.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://northernlightsp.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:00:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Software as a Service to the Rescue – Part 2: Complexities of Document Level Security</title><link>http://northernlight.com/2010/06/02/software-as-a-service-to-the-rescue-part-2-complexities-of-document-level-security/#comment-192097112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"No CIO in his or her right mind would want to be within shouting distance of a mess like that.  "  Great line and true.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"In this scenario, the buffer of a Software as a Service provider whose application is fully informed about which employee has rights to each document represents an enormous comfort as well as valuable insurance."   Great point,  and important.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But last time I checked, Northern Light was the only company with this complex and valuable capability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How uncharacteristically quiet you are on this point.  Are you feeling all right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">valerie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SaaS to the Rescue - Part 1: Interfacing to Third-Party Publishers</title><link>http://northernlight.com/2010/05/19/saas-to-the-rescue-part-1-interfacing-to-third-party-publishers/#comment-192097105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's impressive that third-party publishers trust Northern Light to do this aggregation and indexing, given that the content sets we're talking about are the "crown jewels" of their businesses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Domeshek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beyond Sentiment Scoring</title><link>http://northernlight.com/2009/10/26/beyond-sentiment-scoring/#comment-192097103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the "few other things" that speakers mentioned at the recent TA conference are half as interesting as the strategic business analysis you're describing, it bodes well indeed for the future of text analytics applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Domeshek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:19:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beyond Sentiment Scoring</title><link>http://northernlight.com/2009/10/26/beyond-sentiment-scoring/#comment-192097101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting post.  If only a first class meaning extraction solution were commercially available  to leapfrog past simple sentiment scoring.  Why ... wait a moment.  I remind myself that Northern Light has pioneered just such a capability for its SinglePoint clients, yes?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">valerie o'connell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:09:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
